Wednesday, October 30, 2019
Overview of the campaign at the battle of King's Mountain 1780 Essay
Overview of the campaign at the battle of King's Mountain 1780 - Essay Example Ferguson sent a warning to the frontiersmen: if they did not ââ¬Å"desist from their opposition to the British army, and take protection under his standard, he wouldà march his army over the mountains, hang their leaders, and lay their country waste with fire and swordâ⬠1. The patriots responded by gathering a force of about 1,400 militiamen, with no formal military training, belonging to ten counties. Under the command of Col. William Campbell,à of Washington County, Virginia, the Overmountain Men pursued Fergusonââ¬â¢s forces to Kingââ¬â¢s Mountain on the afternoon of 7 October. The patriots divided forces into four columns, encircled the mountain and attacked the defensive position of the Loyalist forces on the exposed, rocky ridge. Using their skill in sharpshooting and moving under cover, learned in the frontiers wars, the patriots overwhelmed Fergusonsââ¬â¢s forces and decisively won the battle in a little over one hour of combat. Accepted figures give the casualties as 225 Loyalists killed, 163 wounded and 716 captured, while only 28 Patriots were killed, including Colonel James Williams, and 68 wounded.à The Battle of Kingââ¬â¢s Mountain was a turning point in the Revolutionary War. Cornwallis retreated from Charlotte, North Carolina and was forced on the defensive. The patriots gained time to recoup and went on to win the
Monday, October 28, 2019
The character of Curleys Wife Essay Example for Free
The character of Curleys Wife Essay Steinbeck demonstrates Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife as ââ¬Ëunwantedââ¬â¢ when it comes to relationships. Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife shares an unenthusiastic and loveless relationship with her husband. â⬠You seen that glove on his left hand? Well, that gloves fulla Vaseline, Curley says hes keepin that hand soft for his wifeâ⬠is a primary example of this. This quote personifies the fact that Curley only wants a sexual relationship with his wife, and uses her for intimate means only. Additionally, Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife is not highly admired among the ranch workers. ââ¬ËTartââ¬â¢ and ââ¬ËJailbaitââ¬â¢ are just two of the many words used by the ranch workers to describe Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife. This means that they perceive her as trouble and they try to keep away from her. One of the most important relations anybody has is one with their own mother. Curleyââ¬â¢s wife shares quite an unpleasant relationship with her mother. This words ââ¬Å"I always thought my olââ¬â¢ lady stole itâ⬠, are a vivid example of how Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife had her dream to become an actress, overseen by her mother. The relationship between Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife and George is quite similar to Curleyââ¬â¢s Wifeââ¬â¢s relationship with the other ranch workers. As soon as George sees Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife for the first time, he straight away turns to Lennie and coldly says Jesus, what a tramp. These words concisely and efficiently explain the initial thoughts felt by George upon first look at Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife. When George tells Lennie off for calling her ââ¬Å"purtyâ⬠he also illustrates his thoughts in a more influential way with the words; ââ¬Å"Dont you even take a look at that bitch. I dont care what she says and what she does. I seen em poison before. â⬠The words ââ¬Å"bitchâ⬠and ââ¬Å"poisonâ⬠, clarify that George despises Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife, probably more than anyone else on the ranch. Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife and Crooks are two dissimilar yet comparable characters. They are comparable because both are isolated from other people, albeit for different reasons. Crooks is left isolated from fellow ranch workers due to racial differences, same for Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife but because she is s woman. However, the portrayal of Crooks shows that he is an understanding and composed person, completely different to Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife. The differences between these characters prove to be greater than first expected when Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife tells Crooks ââ¬Å"Well, you keep your place then, Nigger. I could get you strung upon a tree so easy it ainââ¬â¢t even funny. â⬠These words indicate that Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife is also in favour of using Crooksââ¬â¢ skin colour against him. Like the relationships shared by Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife, with other ranch members, her relationship with Candy is not an appealing one. Having said this, both of these characters can once again relate to each other, through a sense of lonesomeness. Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife and Candy definitely despise each other and this is visible through words such as ââ¬Å"that bitchâ⬠and ââ¬Å"you god damn trampâ⬠, used by Candy, when talking about Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife. John Steinbeck shows a key connection in the relationship between Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife and Lennie. Curleys wife is a lot like Lennie in numerous ways; both are alone, controlled by those around them, not trusted because of what they are like and have dreams that they really wants to come true. We feel sorry for them because we can see that they desperately want to try and break free from the life they are caught up in, but George keeps Lennie behind, and Curley keeps his wife behind. They end up confiding in each other as the novel comes to an end. ââ¬Å"Well, I ainââ¬â¢t told this to nobody before. Maybe I oughten to â⬠When Curleyââ¬â¢s Wifeââ¬â¢s she says these words to Lennie in the barn, the reader realises that this is the first time Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife has opened up to anyone. This results in the reader thinking that Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife trusts Lennie. In conclusion, my opinion is that Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife does seek attention; however this is only because she has been dispossessed of attention throughout her life. Her unwilling marriage to Curley, the fact that she could not accomplish her dream and her having a lack of friends and reverence made me feel regretful about my first impression of her. Steinbeck presents Curleyââ¬â¢s Wife in an apathetic way which robustly influences the readerââ¬â¢s image of her. Nevertheless, as the novel reaches its end this negative feeling received by the reader soon changes into that of commiseration. Steinbeck has created a character for us to feel sympathetic towards. Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE John Steinbeck section.
Saturday, October 26, 2019
The Berlin Wall :: European History Cold War
The Berlin Wall Throughout the history of the World, there are many great facts, and things to learn. There is an abundance of information out there not only about our country but about the rest of the world also. After researching the Berlin Wall, I was quite interested, and did not realize what I was missing out on about the past history of our world. I am going to share all that I learned about the Berlin Wall, and how it made a difference in our past and future times. Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã The Berlin Wall was built on the night between 12th and 13th August 1961. Everyone always asks why the Berlin Wall was built and what did it stand for. In 1945, following World War II, Germany was divided into two countries - East Germany and West Germany. East Germany was controlled by the communist regime of the Soviet Union while West Germany became a democracy supported by the United States. Berlin, the former capital city, although entirely within East German borders, was also split into two. On August 13, 1961, the German Democratic Republic (GDR) decided to block off East Berlin and West Berlin by means of a barbed wire. Streets were torn up, and barricades erected. Rail lines and the subway between East and West Berlin was torn up. People of East Berlin and the GDR were no longer allowed to enter West Berlin disrupting 60,000 commuters who were employed in West Berlin. Within the year, construction work began to build a solid wall separating the two cities. The German Democratic Republic along with 60,000 commuters, under the leadership of Erich Honecker. The Berlin Wall fell down on November 9th, 1989. In my opinion, the Berlin Wall was built simply because; Germany was controlled by Communist Regime, and by the Soviet Union. Those two groups are not going to get along, and that is why I believe they were split up. Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Since I learned to read music, and play it well, it has been a large part of my life. I learned that just playing the note on the page perfect is not music. To play music well, you have to feel it in your body, spirit, mind, and soul. The music that has been picked out this year, in my opinion, is the best music I have ever played. My favorite is 2nd Dawning, and not just because I have to write about it, but it really is.
Thursday, October 24, 2019
In what ways and to what effect, does Milton use comparison in Paradise Lost Book II? Essay
Paradise Lost is one of the greatest epic poems of the 17th century, written by John Milton. This is a poem of twelve books describing the fall of man in blank verse, in a manner that is at par with Virgilââ¬â¢s Aeneid for the Romans and Homerââ¬â¢s Iliad for ancient Greece. Milton has several ways of using comparison, which he uses profoundly throughout Book II. Allegory, allusions, contrasts, the comparison between heaven, earth and hell, and the different arguments in the book are the most significant and prominent in his poem, and both pertain to his grand style as well as his motifs. Towards the end of book II, Milton presents an allegory of the two figures Sin and Death at the gates of hell who represent their respective abstract ideas and principles, which he develops throughout the entire poem. As they are abstract ideas, they cannot be visualized, thus Milton gives them physical attributes to further allude to the ideas they represent. Sin is described as ââ¬Å"â⬠¦ woman to the waist, and fair, But ended foul in many a scaly fold Voluminous and vast, a serpent armed With mortal sting.â⬠(II.650-53) With this description, itââ¬â¢s clear to see that Sin is an allegory of Eve because Eve is also beautiful and ââ¬Å"fairâ⬠on the outside, but deep inside is evil and tempted by a ââ¬Å"serpentâ⬠, even if she is not composed of one. Also, Sin explains how she was seduced by Satan, and as a result of their fornication, conceive Death. She then explains how Death raped her ââ¬Å"â⬠¦in embraces forcible and foulâ⬠(II.793) and created monsters that are ââ¬Å"hourly conceived And hourly born, with sorrow infinite To me;â⬠(II.797-99) Both Eve and Sin are seduced by Satan, have excruciatingly painful labor, and bring about the beginning of mortality for all of mankind as a result of sin. Milton has created Sin as an allegory of the whole concept of sin, and furthermore, suggested that women accomplish their sin by being seductive and beautiful, yet evil and serpent-like. Death on the other hand, is a shadow-like creature, described as having a ââ¬Å"â⬠¦head The likeness of a kingly crown had on.â⬠(II.672-73) He is allegorically the consequence of both Sin and Satanââ¬â¢s sin. Interestingly enough, Death is in control of his condition, and instead of enduring suffering himself, he enjoys inflicting human pain. This can clearly be seen as a symbolic, comparative representation of death on earth and how it often inflicts human pain, as well as the way in which us humans are not in control of it. The effect of this comparative literary technique enables the reader to stretch the imagination in order to effectively draw symbolic conclusions and make logical deductions. Another effect of this technique is that it introduces multiple interpretations. For example, another interpretation of Sin and Death is that they could be the pathway for humans to enter Hell through Death, and Sin could simply be one who has paved that way by giving birth to eternal mortality, or alternatively they could be an allegory of The Holy Trinity. These different interpretations lead to a deeper understanding of t he poem, and make it all the more intriguing. As well as making allegorical allusions, Milton also makes allusions to other literary works. The first allusion he makes is in the first two lines of Book two; ââ¬Å"High on a throne of royal state, which far Outshone the wealth of Ormus and of Ind,â⬠¦Ã¢â¬ (II.1-2) are an allusion to Ormus and Ind. Ormus is an island in the Persian Gulf, and Ind is an abbreviation for India. He makes reference to these places because theyââ¬â¢re highly celebrated for their pearls and jewels. ââ¬Å"Sage he stood, With Atlantean shoulders fit to bear The weight of the mightiest monarchies;â⬠(II.305-7) is another allusion to the Greek mythological figure Atlas, who was able to carry the world. Milton uses references to specific people and places in order to emphasize and reinforce the grand stature of the character(s) he Is referring to, which in the above examples, would be Satan and Beelzebub respectively. Another purpose of his allusions is to further extend the readerââ¬â¢s imagination and understanding, whilst creating vivid imagery in the readerââ¬â¢s mind, through comparisons. Lastly, these allusions are important in his work because they not only make his writing exotic, but they also add a lot of weight and grandeur to his style. Another comparative literary feature that is quite prominent in Miltonââ¬â¢s works is the use of contrasts, such as antitheses and oxymoronââ¬â¢s. These figures of speech are important in Paradise Lost because they are used to convey and accentuate vivid, yet unorthodox imagery. ââ¬Å"To that bad eminenceâ⬠(II.6) and ââ¬Å"â⬠¦this darkness lightâ⬠(II.220) are among his many uses of oxymoronââ¬â¢s. This poetic device not only extends the imagery of the poem, but it also heightens the message or emotion behind it in a non-literal sense. A powerful example of antithesis which is not in Book II, but was still discussed in class is, ââ¬Å"Hee for God only, Shee for God in himâ⬠. This is a powerful example because Milton has conveyed sharply contrasting ideas in an emphatic, yet adorning way. Accompanying this feature are the contrasts between light and dark to convey good or bad. With this, his contrasts also include high and low (in terms of altitude or status), and God and Satan. Miltonââ¬â¢s strong imagery of light and darkness to convey these contrary ideas could be attributed to his blindness. Although he describes Satan as a powerful being, he generally describes hell as dark, fiery and very low, as opposed to heaven which is described as light and highly exalted. This can be noted in ââ¬Å"What can be worse Than to dwell here, driven out from bliss, condemned In this abhorred deep to utter woe; Where pain of unextinguishable fireâ⬠¦Ã¢â¬ (II.85) and a few lines later he states ââ¬Å"He from Heavenââ¬â¢s higthâ⬠(II.190) Contrasts like these are important because they help us to further extend our understanding of Miltonââ¬â¢s paradigms of food and bad, and from this, we can deduce that the absence of light in Hell and in Satan symbolize the absence of God in all his glory. Miltonââ¬â¢s contrasts of light and dark, and high and low to convey good and bad are also used to contrast Heaven, Hell and Earth. Milton presents a hierarchy based on the proximity to God. Heaven is at the top of the hierarchy where ââ¬Å"Heavenââ¬â¢s high Arbitratorâ⬠(II.359) sits, and the primary quality is light. Hell is at the very bottom of the hierarchy and is portrayed as the antithesis of heaven, which is primarily dark. ââ¬Å"As he our darkness, cannot we his lightâ⬠(II.269) Is a phrase which best portrays the strong contrasts between the two places. Earth is depicted as the young, vulnerable middle-ground connected to both Heaven and Earth. It is also the battlefield that Beelzebub suggests they try to corrupt because he knows that although there is goodness on earth, it is not at par with that of Heavenââ¬â¢s, and is thus able to be defeated. It is portrayed as the neutral middle-ground by Beelzebub who states that the new race of man is ââ¬Å"To be created like to us, though less In power an excellence, but favoured more Of him who rules above;â⬠(II.349-351) Also, Miltonââ¬â¢s geographical description of hell has similar physical features as earth (Mountains, rivers, valleys), however, the only difference is that hell has the worst in nature. Milton describes hell as ââ¬Å"â⬠¦dark and wild, beat with perpetual storms Of whirlwind and dire hail, which on firm land Thaws not,â⬠(II.588-90) with streams ââ¬Å"Whose waves of torrent fire inflame with rage.â⬠(II.581) By knowing that Hell is the degenerated form of nature, and that Earth is the middle-ground, we can deduce that Heaven is the more natural and aesthetically pleasing form of nature. This further highlights the hierarchical contrast between the three places. An interesting observation I made was that Earth is connected to heaven with a gold chain and connected to hell through a dark gulf (Chaos and Night). This shows the contrast between the journey to Heaven and Hell. Milton is implying that throughout life, Man must choose to make the difficult, strenuous journey up the gold chain into Heaven, or take the easy way and perambulate down to Heaven through the wide gulf. These hierarchical contrasts and comparisons not only give clarity to the settings in the poem, but also give us a deeper understanding of the nature of the characters in the story. Most importantly, it provides a philosophical and theological context for the poem and it gives us deeper insight into the beliefs and prin ciples that Milton adheres to, without being persuasive. The hierarchy and balance of good and evil are also portrayed and compared through the different speeches given by arch devils Moloch, Belial, Mammon and Beelzebub. Milton seems to depict a certain balance between good and evil or Heaven and Hell, and from that, it is clear that he believes that good will always reign over evil. The first arch devil to speak is Moloch. He proposes open warfare on a battlefield. He believes they have nothing to lose because ââ¬Å"What can be worse Than to swell here, driven out from bliss, condemned In this abhorred deep to utter woe;â⬠(II.85-87) So he clearly believes that nothing can be worse than living in hell anyway. Lastly, he says even if they are defeated in the battle ââ¬Å"â⬠¦if not victory, is yet revengeâ⬠(II.1.5). The second speaker is Belial who disagrees and suggests that they stay in hell in the hope that God will forgives them, or over time, they will grow used to the eternal pain and suffering. He has based his reasoning on the belief that even if God could kill them, he never would, and because he is almighty, he can see everything they are doing, and thus, they might be subjected to an even worse hell. The third speaker, Mammon, disagrees to both proposals and suggests that they build a kingdom in hell that will someday be equal to Heaven, because open warfare would be unavailing, and they would not want to go back to living in heaven eternally anyway. Finally, Beelzebub proposes that they do neither. He states that war will be futile because there is no place where God does not reign, so instead, Beelzebub tells them of a new race that God created called ââ¬Å"Manâ⬠, and suggests that they seek revenge against him by seducing Man to their side. This is the decision that is unanimously agreed upon. All these proposalââ¬â¢s present Miltonââ¬â¢s views about the balance of good and evil, as well as his theological beliefs. The first proposal is rejected because open warfare between Heaven and Hell would be ineffective as Heaven and righteousness will always conquer evil. Belialââ¬â¢s proposal is dismissed because the fallen angels would never be forgiven by God because evil will never go away, thus, the fallen angels will always exist. Finally, as Mammon suggests, there will never be peace between Heaven and Hell because Hell will never match up to Heavenââ¬â¢s greatness, and although Hell will always exist, it will always be under Godââ¬â¢s control. The reason Beelzebubââ¬â¢s proposal is agreed upon is because Milton believes that Earth, and therefore Mankind, is the neutral, middle-ground between Heaven and Hell, Angels and Devils, as well as good and evil. It therefore serves as an effective battleground for good and evil forces on earth, as well as in the souls and consciences of mankind. The effect of these comparisons gives us further insight into the beliefs of the philosophical and theological elements in Miltonââ¬â¢s time period, as well as the relative forces of good and evil, and how they effect the lives of mankind. In conclusion, there are various ways that Milton uses comparison in Paradise Lost, which each have different effects that range from the introduction of multiple interpretations, to simply extending our understanding of the story through vivid imagery. The comparisons that Milton uses are so complex that they are all connected in some way or other, and this alone gives us an even deeper understanding of the theological and philosophical messages conveyed in the poem. Ultimately, Miltonââ¬â¢s intension was to tell the story of Manââ¬â¢s fall, and with his comparisons, he has managed to do much more than just that.
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Explain why effective communicating in developing positive relationships is important Essay
Explain why effective communicating in developing positive relationships with children, young people and adults is important Effective communication is important with children because it helps them to feel valued. It shows them that their interests and opinions are listened to. When we listen and communicate with children, this gives them more self-confidence and it also helps to increase their self-esteem, both of these being so important for their future. The child we are communicating with needs to feel at ease and be given the opportunity to communicate back with comfort and confidence. Children need to have role models, they need to understand that these people eg.teachers , classroom assistants or school principles must be listened too, respected and obeyed. Communicating clearly with children (either giving orders or simply praising them) helps to establish this, and in return, hopefully you will built trust and respect. This is vital if a child needs to confide in us regarding aspects of their life which may be troubling them. Eg bullying, family life or maybe having negative feeling. As children slowly learn how to respect you, it should help to develop how they communicate with others. It allows them to develop and reach their maximum potential as they learn how to exchange information. Relationship problems can develop when there is a lack of communication, or donââ¬â¢t have the skills to communicate effectively. These skills include:à good listening skillsà using the word ââ¬Å"Iâ⬠eg I would like you to tell me â⬠¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦. using the childââ¬â¢s name ââ¬â this makes things more personalà speaking in an even toneà using short sentencesà giving short and clear instructionsà open body language We can communicate in different ways: -The way we speak ââ¬â tone of voice, clarity etc -Gestures ââ¬â pointing, hand movements etc -Body language ââ¬â arms folded etc -Facial expressions ââ¬â angry, smiling etx Effective communication is important for the smooth running of any situation.
Tuesday, October 22, 2019
Burial in different cultures (
Burial in different cultures ( Burial in Mythology Practices of the Ancient Egyptian and Greco-Roman Cultures Ancient Egyptian and Greco-Roman practices of preparing the dead for the next cradle of humanity are very intriguing. These two cultures differ in amultitude of ways yet similarities can be noted in the domain of funerary services. In the realm of Egyptian afterlife, The Book of the Dead canprovide one with vital information concerning ritual entombment practicesand myths of the afterlife. The additional handouts I received fromTimothy Stoker also proved to be useful in trying uncover vital informationregarding the transition into another life.Regarding the burial practicesof Greece and Rome, parts of Homer's Odyssey are useful in the analysis ofproper interment methods. One particular method used by the Egyptians was an intricateprocess known as mummification. It was undoubtedly a very involved processspanning seventy days in some cases. First, all the internal organs wereremoved with one exception, the h eart.Egyptian VIf the body was not already West ofthe Nile it was transported across it, but not before the drying processwas initiated. Natron (a special salt) was extracted from the banks of theNile and was placed under the corpse, on the sides, on top, and bags of thesubstance were placed inside the body cavity to facilitate the process of dehydration. After thirty-five days the ancient embalmers would anoint thebody with oil and wrap it in fine linen. If the deceased was wealthyenough a priest donning a mask of Anubis would preside over the ceremoniesto ensure proper passage into the next realm. One of the practices overseen by the priest was the placing of aspecial funerary amulet over the heart. This was done in behest to secure asuccessful union with Osiris and their kas. The amulet made sure the heartdid not speak out against the individual at the scale of the goddess...
Monday, October 21, 2019
Conservative, Liberal & Radical approach towards Poverty essays
Conservative, Liberal & Radical approach towards Poverty essays In this paper, I will create an argument towards conservative and liberal approach of poverty, while supporting the radical approach. I will start with the facts about the U.S. poverty. Americans living in poverty have increased significantly. The gap between the rich and the poor is continuously increasing. Race, region, class are some of the important factors that should be taken into consideration when determining who are poor. The Census Bureau report included the following findings: Poverty rate for minorities, Blacks, Hispanics, Asian Americans is continuously increasing. The rate in the south rose to 13.5 percent, from 12.8 percent in 2000. The South is the home to more than 40 percent of all the nations poor. The poverty rate for the suburbs rose to 8.2 percent lasts year from 7.8 percent in 2000. The number of people in suburban area rose by 700,000 to 12 million (RCG, page 288). Who are poor? What causes poverty? What are the solutions? Taking a conservative position to these questions focus will be on the urban class people and the reasons for poverty would be culture of poverty that is, lack of work ethics, female headed households, poverty programs and the government programs. The solutions would be eliminating anti-poverty programs, faith based initiatives, government policies that promote marriage and work. Taking a liberal position to above questions, again the focus will be on urban class and culture of poverty. Poverty is caused by lack of jobs in the post-Fordism economy due the decline of manufacturing jobs and tremendous increase in the service sector jobs. Manufacturing jobs are being outsourced and on the other side people do not have necessary skills or the education for the service industry jobs. The solutions for eradicating poverty taking a liberal position would be more use of macro economic policies, supporting employment through trainin g, child care support and universal...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)